As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Sony, a dominant figure in the audio industry, leads the way in making incredible headphones. Its abilities show brightly in the domain of top-rated wireless noise-cancelling headphones. Sony’s name is often included in talks concerning audio quality.
If you’re torn between the Sony WH-H900N and Sony WH-1000XM3, your predicament is about to be resolved. Brace yourself, because I’m about to bring the dispute to a close.
Prepare to see the clash: Sony WH-H900N vs. WH-1000XM3, as we clear any doubts and guide you to a confident decision.
Sony WH-H900N Vs WH-1000XM3: Who Is The Winner? – A Comprehensive Guide
To begin, let us create a basic comprehension of their distinctions. Have a look at the table below. With it as a foundation, let’s get into the details. Start by looking at their comfort and design.
|Features||Sony WH-1000XM3||Sony WH-H900N|
|Driver Size||40 mm.||40 mm.|
|Frequency Response||4 Hz to 40 kHz (Wireless).||20 Hz to 20 kHz (Wireless) 5 Hz to 40 kHz (Wired).|
|Impedance||47 Ohms (Active) 16 Ohms (Passive).||32 Ohms (Active). 16 Ohms (Passive).|
|Sensitivity||101 dB at 1 kHz (Passive) 105 dB at 1 kHz (Active).||103 dB at 1 kHz (Active) 98 dB at 1 kHz (Passive).|
|Battery Life||30 Hours (BT+ANC) 38 Hours (BT).||28 Hours (BT+ANC) 34 Hours (BT).|
|Standby Time||Max. 30 Hours (NC on) Max. 200 Hours (NC off).||Max. 48 Hours (NC on) Max. 200 Hours (NC off).|
|Charging Time||3 Hours.||6 Hours.|
|Fast Charging||10 min charge = 5 hours playback.||10 min charge = 65 minutes playback.|
|Wireless Range||10 m.||10 m.|
|Codec Support||AAC, LDAC, SBC, AptX, AptX HD.||AAC, LDAC, SBC, AptX, AptX HD.|
|Wired Connectivity||3.5 mm.||3.5 mm TRS.|
|Color||Black, Silver.||Black, Blue, Dark Gary, Red.|
|Dimension||7.31 x 2.94 x 10.44 inches.||6.9 x 4.53 x 7.88 inches.|
|Weight||9 ounces.||10.2 ounces.|
|Check Details||See More||See More|
What’s in the box
|Sony WH-1000XM3||Sony WH-H900N|
|Carry Case||Protective Case|
|Warranty Card||Warranty Card|
Fit & Comfort
Without a doubt, the WH-1000XM3 has a more modern and futuristic design. Unlike the H900N, its higher build quality, despite sharing the same material composition, demonstrates enhanced durability—capable of withstanding unexpected drops.
When it comes to headphones, comfort is everything. Long-term use without discomfort is critical. Fit and comfort are both important in this situation. After all, what good is a great headset if it doesn’t provide long-lasting comfort?
Both versions match your head shape perfectly. The adjustable headband provides a proper fit, and the clamping force finds a good balance. The WH-1000XM3 has an advantage due to its reduced weight, which improves overall comfort.
In terms of sound quality, these headphones shine. While both provide excellent audio performance, there are subtle differences between the two.
Choosing between them is based on your unique preferences, ensuring the optimal acoustic experience adapted to your taste.
With these insights in mind, let’s go deeper into their sound characteristics to help you make the best pick for your auditory delight.
Design & Build
The Sony WH-H900N and Sony WH-1000XM3 headphones are built of durable yet lightweight plastics. The absence of imitation leather covering the ear cups, on the other hand, is a distinguishing characteristic; instead, velvety soft-touch material is used, creating a tactile experience as your fingertips smoothly glide across.
Their foldable shape and swiveling ear cups emphasize portability, allowing for convenient storage in your carrying pouch.
Both models have a touch sensor control mechanism on the right ear cup, which provides a user-friendly interface. However, nuances distinguish them.
The WH-1000XM3 has its name inscribed on the headband, whereas the WH-H900N does not. In comparison to the H900N, the 1000XM3 incorporates two visible microphones atop each ear cup, adding to its luxury looks.
The Sony WH-H900N wireless noise-cancelling headphones are well-known for their excellent sound quality. My encounter with Hot Chip’s single “Ready For The Floor” demonstrated its prowess – the audio was extremely clear, with no distortion.
The bass, while not as powerful as on the Sony WH-1000XM3, is constant, complementing a well-balanced treble and mid-range. However, it’s worth mentioning that the frequency range’s brilliance is dependent on the music genre.
In comparison, the Sony WH-1000XM3 revels in producing tremendous bass. While this may be overwhelming for those looking for a balanced audio experience, it is a treasure trove for bass fans. Avicii’s “Addicted to You (David Guetta Remix)” exemplifies the noise-canceling system’s expertise in bass-heavy music.
However, the WH-1000XM3’s powerful bass sometimes covers high notes, resulting in significantly less detailed treble.
The Sony Headphones Connect app offers a choice of preset EQs, adapting to specific preferences. This characteristic, while improving adaptability, presented a conundrum. As a result, the final judgment is a tie between the two models.
Both the WH-H900N and the WH-1000XM3 excel at noise cancellation. The looming question is: who wins in this regard? It’s time to put their noise-canceling powers to the test and see who wins.
The Sony WH-H900N’s noise-cancelling performance falls short. Its isolation performance in the bass range is roughly 9dB, which covers sounds like airplane and bus engines – a rather typical result.
It also considerably reduces speech and mid-range noises by up to 11. It cancels more than 30dB in the treble range.
These headphones may efficiently reduce background noise in quiet areas, but their performance is disappointing given the price tag.
The Sony WH 1000XM3, on the other hand, tells a completely different narrative. Their ANC system is exceptional, filtering out a wide range of environmental noises, from the deep rumbles of transportation engines to the high-frequency buzz of air conditioning systems.
If you’re looking for a great noise-canceling experience, the WH 1000XM3 unquestionably takes the lead, making it a worthwhile pick for people who appreciate superior noise-reduction capabilities.
Both headphones include built-in microphones and work similarly. However, the recorded voice may appear relatively thin and missing in detail, with a distinct muted quality on both models.
Despite this, the Sony WH 1000XM3 provides better speech comprehension. As a result, the 1000XM3’s recording quality outperforms that of the H900N.
Moving on to a critical component of wireless headphones, let’s look at their battery life, which is a decisive factor in their utility and convenience.
Microphone or Call Quality
Mic quality is critical for folks who frequently take calls while wearing headphones. Both the WH-H900N and WH-1000XM3 include built-in mics for calls.
However, some users have claimed that the microphone quality is subpar, and that recorded voice may lack depth and clarity.
If call clarity is important to you, the WH-1000XM3 outperforms the WH-H900N.
The Sony WH-H900N has a maximum battery life of 28 hours on a single charge, which is 2 hours longer than the Sony WH-1000XM3.
The H900N takes 6 hours to fully charge, which is twice as long as the XM3. The WH-1000XM3’s quick charging feature again tips the scales in its favor, giving an amazing 5 hours of playback from a 10-minute charge. Under the same rapid charging settings, the WH-H900N provides only 1 hour of playback.
Both models have comparable standby times when noise cancelation is set off, but when noise cancelation is turned on, the WH-1000XM3 wins.
Both headphones have touch-sensitive controls that allow users to navigate music, adjust volume, and manage calls with simple motions.
The control systems in the two versions are very similar, ensuring a consistent user experience. Gesture controls in the ear cups of both headphones allow for intuitive interaction, contributing to an effortless control experience.
However, take in mind that certain users may prefer physical buttons for more accurate control, and this choice may impact your decision.
Bluetooth connectivity is essential for wireless headphones, and both the WH-H900N and WH-1000XM3 have it. The WH-H900N has Bluetooth 4.1, whereas the WH-1000XM3 has Bluetooth 4.2.
This minor difference may result in improved stability and range for the WH-1000XM3.
Both variants also enable NFC (Near Field Communication), allowing for simple and quick pairing with compatible devices. This feature simplifies the pairing procedure, which is especially useful while you’re on the go.
Support for Bluetooth Codec
The Sony WH-H900N has Bluetooth 4.1, whereas the XM3 has Bluetooth 4.2, giving the 1000XM3 a little advantage. Both models also have NFC, which makes pairing easier.
Non-NFC devices can be paired by holding down the power button. However, multi-pairing is not supported. Latency concerns may develop with Bluetooth headphones; the Sony WH-1000XM3 has reduced latency than its cousin.
The XM3 also takes the lead in this category. As we come to the end of this headphone comparison, it’s time to reveal the victor.
Sony has added smart companion apps to improve the functioning of their headphones. The Sony Headphones Connect app is available for both the WH-H900N and WH-1000XM3 models.
This program allows users to customize their listening experience by modifying the equalization settings, enabling surround sound modes, and generating custom sound profiles.
The WH-1000XM3 goes a step further with its Adaptive Sound Control feature, which uses location data to modify noise canceling levels based on your surroundings. This adaptable capability can be a game changer for frequent travelers or people who live in noisy areas.
Sony WH-1000XM3 Vs Sony WH-H900N: Pros And Cons
When comparing the Sony WH-1000XM3 Vs Sony WH-H900N headphones, consider the following pros and cons:
Sony WH-H900N : PROS
Sony WH-H900N : CONS
Sony WH-1000XM3: PROS
Sony WH-1000XM3: CONS
Which is the Winner?
Given the obvious outcome of this comparison, you’ve most certainly made a definite decision regarding your favorite option by now.
The Sony WH-1000XM3 won in every category except one, where it tied rather than lost. With this complete review, I strongly recommend the Sony WH-1000XM3 over the Sony WH-H900N. Its superior design, build quality, durability, extended battery life, improved connectivity, and decreased latency all work together to elevate it.
Notably, the 1000XM3 excels at noise cancellation, which the WH-H900N lacks. If you find any area of performance to be unsatisfactory after reading this review, the section that follows will detail feasible alternatives.
If comfort is important, choose the Bose Quiet Comfort II, which has a balanced sound profile with less focus on bass. In addition, unlike the Sony models, they provide simultaneous pairing with several devices.
Sony’s WH-1000XM4 is another alternative for individuals with a flexible budget. These headphones have industry-leading noise cancellation, thanks to dual noise sensor technology.
The WH-1000XM4 delivers a full package, with a strong 30-hour battery life, rapid charging similar to the 1000XM3, and enhanced call quality. With this, I conclude the information at hand.
Sony WH-H900N Vs WH-1000XM3: Who Is The Winner – FAQs
1. What are the main differences between Sony WH-H900N and WH-1000XM3 headphones?
Sony’s WH-H900N and WH-1000XM3 headphones have distinct features. The WH-H900N has a balanced sound profile and a comfortable fit, whilst the WH-1000XM3 excels in noise cancellation, battery life, and connection. The decision is based on personal tastes and the intended audio experience.
2. Which headphones have the best noise-canceling capabilities?
The Sony WH-1000XM3 is the market leader in noise cancellation, having industry-leading performance with dual noise sensor technology. It successfully filters out numerous ambient disturbances, improving the listening experience, which could be a critical factor for individuals looking for greater noise reduction.
3. Are there significant changes in comfort and design between the two models?
Both versions prioritize comfort, with memory foam earpads and adjustable headbands. The WH-H900N has velvety touch material on the ear cups, whereas the WH-1000XM3 has swiveling ear cups and a folding design for increased portability.
4. How does the battery life of the WH-H900N compare to the WH-1000XM3?
The WH-H900N has a battery life of up to 28 hours, while the WH-1000XM3 has an extra 2 hours. Furthermore, the WH-1000XM3’s quick charging technology allows for 5 hours of playback with just a 10-minute charge, making it an ideal solution for those on the road.
5. Can I change the sound settings on these headphones?
Yes, both models allow you to change the sound profiles. However, the WH-1000XM3’s Sony Headphones Connect app offers more customizing choices, including preset EQs that match to individual preferences, assuring an optimum audio experience.
Without a doubt, our comprehensive comparison of the Sony WH-H900N and WH-1000XM3 attempts to provide the clarity required for an informed decision.
As a fight for innovation and choice in the audio landscape, each model has its own distinct qualities. While the WH-H900N provides balanced features, the WH-1000XM3 takes the lead with superior noise cancellation, prolonged battery life, and seamless connectivity.
This selection is guided by personal tastes, comfort, and acoustic desires. From design to performance, each headphone has significant advantages. Finally, it is critical to prioritize comfort, sound quality, or noise reduction.
The Sony WH-H900N and WH-1000XM3 are examples of Sony’s proficiency in designing distinguished headphones that provide a premium audio experience.
This conversation is intended to assist your decision, ensuring that the chosen gadget matches your requirements. Thank you for taking the time to read this article.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc, or its affiliates.